• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Speak Agent

Speak Agent

  • About
    • About Speak Agent
    • Helping Teachers
    • #1 in Instructional Technology
    • WIDA ELD Standards
  • Programs
        • Programs Overview
        • What We Offer

        • Math + Language
          • Upper Elementary
          • Middle School
          • High School
        • Science + Language
          • Middle School
          • High School
  • Research & Evidence
        • Research Overview
        • What We've Learned

        • A Summary of Impact Studies
        • Four Hours, 10% Higher Math Scores
        • NSF Study Results with Science + Language
        • Student Engagement Matters!
        • The Learning Science Behind Speak Agent
        • Academic Language Drives the Achievement Gap
        • Putting Theory into Practice
        • ESSA Evidence
  • News & Insights
  • Contact Sales
  • Sign In
  • Get Support
Home › The Research Behind Speak Agent

ESSA Evidence

ESSA Tier 2 Evidence

Study Data Supporting “Moderate” Tier 2 Evidence

Speak Agent meets the “moderate” evidence criteria, based on the following findings: 

Tier 2 CriterionTier 2 EvidenceHow Speak Agent Aligns to the Criterion
Study DesignCheckmark MeetsA quasi-experimental design (QED) was used in the two main bodies of research on Speak Agent, as detailed on this webpage: 1. A total of 24,180 Diverse, Title I, and Multilingual Learners in 1,597 class sections at PGCPS had access to Speak Agent all school year (SY21-22), with varying amounts of usage based on teacher and student choice. Multivariate regression analysis (both cross-sectional and time series) was used to determine the independent effect of Speak Agent usage on both Math and English Language Proficiency outcomes, as measured by third-party assessment instruments. 2. Science classes (85% ELL/MLL) were randomly assigned to either the treatment or control condition by an independent evaluator, Rockman et al. The control group received standard instruction. The treatment replaced 30 minutes/week with Speak Agent. The full-year (SY17-18), two-phase study was sponsored by the National Science Foundation. Two follow-on studies reproduced the results.
Significant Favorable EffectsCheckmark Meets1. Diverse, Title I, and Multilingual Learners using Speak Agent in the LEANLAB study were found, on average, to increase Math scores by an additional 1.0% per each Speak Agent module completed (N=46,929) and by 1.37 points on the WIDA ACCESS overall scale score (N=5,361) per each Speak Agent module completed.

Chart showing the two phases of findings

2. Multilingual Learners using Speak Agent in the NSF study significantly outperformed the control group (by 210%) using an independently designed test of academic STEM concepts. Follow-on studies found similar effect sizes.
No Significant Unfavorable EffectsCheckmark MeetsNo statistically significant unfavorable effects have been observed to date in any Speak Agent study.
Multi-Site Sample and OverlapCheckmark MeetsSpeak Agent efficacy data were collected from 92 schools across three states in four separate studies with more than 24,000 students in grades 2-8. 

Navigate this section
  • The Research Behind Speak Agent
    • A Summary of Impact Studies in Math, Language, and Science
    • Four Hours, 10% Higher Math Scores
    • NSF Study Results with Science + Language
    • Student Engagement Matters!
    • The Learning Science Behind Speak Agent
    • Academic Language Drives the Achievement Gap
    • Putting Theory into Practice
    • ESSA Evidence

Footer

Speak Agent logo
  • About the Team
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact Speak Agent
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Podcast

Stay informed!

Subscribe to email updates from Speak Agent.

© 2025 Speak Agent, Inc | Privacy Policy Terms of Service